On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:20:03AM +0800, Asias He wrote: > Commit 777eb1bf15b8532c396821774bf6451e563438f5 disconnects externally > supplied queue_lock before blk_drain_queue(). This would introduce lock > unbalance because theads which have taken the external lock might unlock > the internal lock in the during the queue drain. > > This patch mitigate this by disconnecting the lock after the queue > draining since queue draining makes a lot of request_queue users go > away. Can you please point out how the code is broken and that the code is still broken after the patch but somewhat less likely to actually fail? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
