On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:59:19PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>
> [..]
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> > index 013c7a5..5a953c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> > }
> >
> > while (old_chain && (total < len)) {
> > - tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs);
> > + tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask);
> > if (!tmp)
> > goto err_out;
> >
> > @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
> > if (!bp)
> > goto err_out;
> >
> > - __bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1);
> > -
> > *next = &bp->bio2;
>
> Is this code correct. Now original code might clone bio after split and
> new code will clone the original bio itself and not the split one?
Argh, you're right, I screwed that up.
I'd like to get rid of all the open coded bio_clone()s out there (to
reduce the amount of code that "Only clone bio vecs that are in use" has
to change, but this code is too tricky - I'm just going to drop this
bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
