On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On 13.05.2012 23:59, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 03:52:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> UFS code dosn't update i_blocks which leads to the problems ranging from wrong > >> stat/du to long symlinks (as opposed to inline ones) being damaged. This is > >> a fix. > >> > > > > Yes, when quota support was removed, code that update statistic > > about usage of blocks also was removed. But why so big change to fix this? > > I found this problem some time ago and fixed it with code bellow, > > but may be I missed something? > > > > Hm, I don't know why this code wasn't in my copy. Was it already > propagated to Linus' tree? When will it be? Which tree I should merge > from to get your latest fixes? I created this patch some time ago, but forgot to merge it to main tree. You email remind me about this problem. > My code avoided counting metadata blocks (the ones holding the pointers > to actual blocks in indirect, double-indirect and triple-indirect > chains). I thought that i_blocks doesn't take into account the > metablocks but quick experiment with NetBSD image proved me wrong. So I > retract this patch altogether. > My UFS file size limit patch remains though. > ok, so I will test your patch and my and then take care about merging them into mainline. -- /Evgeniy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
