2012/5/14 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>: > On Sun 13-05-12 15:44:33, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> AFFS code preallocates several blocks as an optimisation. Unfortunately >> it's not protected by lock so the same blocks may end up allocated twice. >> Here is a fix. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@xxxxxxxxx> > The patch looks good to me now. Thanks! You can add: > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Al, will you merge this patch through your tree? AFFS does not seem to > have a maintainer so you are a default fallback... > > Honza > I don't know the AFFS code, so only a question. Instead to use a spin lock, I think we can use a simple mutex. Or is the spin lock mandatory? Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html