On 05/12/2012 08:02 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Let tmpfs into the NOSEC optimization (avoiding file_remove_suid() overhead on most common writes): set MS_NOSEC on its superblocks. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins<hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/shmem.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- 3045N.orig/mm/shmem.c 2012-05-05 10:45:17.888060878 -0700 +++ 3045N/mm/shmem.c 2012-05-05 10:46:05.732062006 -0700 @@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ int shmem_fill_super(struct super_block } } sb->s_export_op =&shmem_export_ops; + sb->s_flags |= MS_NOSEC;
Isn't setting the flag on inode better? Something like: diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index f99ff3e..7d98fb5 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2325,6 +2325,7 @@ static void shmem_init_inode(void *foo) { struct shmem_inode_info *info = foo; inode_init_once(&info->vfs_inode); + info->vfs_inode.i_flags |= S_NOSEC; } static int shmem_init_inodecache(void) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html