On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 17:12 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > > Although we can do that using spin_is_contended() and cond_resched(), > changing cond_resched_lock() to satisfy such a need is another option. > Yeah, not a pretty patch. Changing all cond_resched_lock() sites just to change one and in such an ugly way too. So what's the impact of making spin_needbreak() work for !PREEMPT? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
