On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > > > Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked > > as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories > > changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment > > leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these. > > > > Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4. > > Hi Ted, what would be the fate of this patch-set? Hi Ted, I am sorry for being annoying, but what do you think about these patches? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
