On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:48:28PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> index aca1790..90f7c2e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
> @@ -138,16 +138,23 @@ int __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(const char *where, unsigned int line,
> }
>
> int __ext4_handle_dirty_super(const char *where, unsigned int line,
> - handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb)
> + handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb,
> + int now)
> {
> struct buffer_head *bh = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh;
> int err = 0;
>
> if (ext4_handle_valid(handle)) {
> + ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb,
> + (struct ext4_super_block *)bh->b_data);
> err = jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle, bh);
> if (err)
> ext4_journal_abort_handle(where, line, __func__,
> bh, handle, err);
> + } else if (now) {
> + ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb,
> + (struct ext4_super_block *)bh->b_data);
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> } else
> sb->s_dirt = 1;
> return err;
What's the point of having the ext4_handle_dirty_super_now() variant?
I don't see the point of having this?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
