Re: [RFC] jbd2: reduce the number of writes when commiting a transacation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:41:08PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:19:48PM +0000, djwong wrote:
> > 
> > My huge checksum patchset _does_ include checksums for data blocks; see the
> > t_checksum field in struct journal_block_tag_s.  iirc the corresponding journal
> > replay modifications will skip over corrupt data blocks and keep going.
> 
> I need to check for this in the patches (and you may be doing this
> already), but in the kernel failed checksums should result in an
> ext4_error() call which will set the file system as corrupt and
> needing to be checked.  And in e2fsck it should force a full check of
> the file system.

I'm fairly sure the kernel patch doesn't do that, I think it just skips the
block and moves on.

As for e2fsck... what does one do inside e2fsck to force a full check?  Is that
just the equivalent of passing -f?

--D
> 
> 					- Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux