Steve Dickson [SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > > Returning ESTALERETRY would be registering for it in a way and it is > > somewhat cleaner than having to go all the way back up to the fstype to > > figure out whether you want to retry it or not. > How would legacy apps handle this new errno, esp if they have logic > to take care of ESTALE errors? > > steved. As I understand, there is no new errno for the apps. This new ESTALERETRY is produced and consumed by kernel only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
