Il 13/04/2012 16:06, Matthew Garrett ha scritto:
HFS+ doesn't really implement hard links - instead, hardlinks are indicated by a magic file type which refers to an indirect node in a hidden directory. The spec indicates that stat() should return the inode number of the indirect node, but it turns out that this doesn't satisfy the firmware when it's looking for a bootloader - it wants the catalog ID of the hardlink file instead. Fix up this case. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett<mjg@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c b/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c index c640ba5..5ee0681 100644 --- a/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/ioctl.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static int hfsplus_ioctl_bless(struct file *file, int __user *user_flags) struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(inode->i_sb); struct hfsplus_vh *vh = sbi->s_vhdr; struct hfsplus_vh *bvh = sbi->s_backup_vhdr; + int cnid = (u32)(unsigned long)dentry->d_fsdata;
Why a double cast? Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
