On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 04/12/2012 10:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Stupid question: is there any fundamental feature of ext4 this depends > > on, or would this fix work equally well for fs/ext3? > > First of all, Bruce and Ted, thanks a lot for your patience with those > patches! > > I have not looked into it in detail yet, but it should be possible to > back port it to ext3. I don't think there is anything that would depend > on ext4. I also have ext3 on my todo list, but I first wanted to have it > in ext4 (in the sense of stability of ext3, if there still should be a > bug...) and I think for 3.4 it is too late now anyways. So unless there > are objections, lets target the back port to ext3 for 3.5? That sounds sensible, thanks! --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
