On Sunday 01 April 2012, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + > >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > >> fs/Makefile | 1 + > >> fs/nextfd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + > >> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > > > I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please > > also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the > > various architectures using the generic syscall table. > > Arnd: do you have any interest in leveraging the syscall scripts I did > for x86? I have tried to make them as generic as possible, with the > hope of getting more and more of syscall information into more easily > processed form. Sounds interesting, but I'm not planning to do the changes myself, especially since I have no machine that actually uses the generic syscall table. Maybe I should ask the next person who submits a new architecture to do that work, that's usually how progress in asm-generic happens these days ;-) Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
