On Mon 02-04-12 16:44:09, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 21-03-12 18:14:30, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to > > > the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This > > > patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times. > > Looks good. I've added the patch to my tree. > > I would like to test v2 against your tree, I found this one: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git > > but I do not see this patch there - is that the right tree, or may be > you did not push out? Which branch should I use? Yeah, I didn't push out the changes. Now they are out (for_next / for_testing) branch. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
