On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Well, I ran vanilla the tests in vanilla 3.3 overnight, they were fine. > > But may be I was lucky. I'll try to run the tests with vanilla kernel > > some more. I mean, it would make more sense to report something against > > vanilla 3.3, not a patched 3.3. > That's true. Frankly I think you were lucky with hitting the bug with > patched kernel rather than not hitting it with vanilla :). What test did > you run exactly? I've sent a separate report (Subject: 3.3 oops). The oops there is a bit different comparing to this one, though. For this oops I used the same kvm setup. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
