On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Variants:
> 1) drop that commit, fold obvious fix into it, leave it for for-next
> once -rc1 is there; ask you to pull the branch with that sucker excluded
> 2) fold the fix into commit, ask you to pull the resulting branch
> 3) add fix to the end of existing branch, ask to pull
Let's go for (2). I'll take a new look after the pull request, but no
guarantees that I'll then pull it.
Btw, I liked the do_lookup cleanups, but nicer commit logs would have
been good. Especially the first lines. The whole
untangling do_lookup(), part 1
untangling do_lookup(), part 2
untangling do_lookup(), part 3
untangling do_lookup(), part 4
untangling do_lookup(), part 5
untangling do_lookup(), part 6
untangling do_lookup(), part 7
untangling do_lookup(), part 8
untangling do_lookup(), part 9
in shortlogs (and gitk!) does turn me off. So since you have to redo
the series anyway, can I ask you to perhaps try to make it a bit more
descriptive?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
