Thank you. I will test and assuming all goes well apply to the smack-next tree. On 3/29/2012 12:19 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Dave Chinner wrote: >> Yes, because you have no idea what the calling context is except >> for the fact that is from somewhere inside filesystem code and the >> filesystem could be holding locks. Therefore, GFP_NOFS is really the >> only really safe way to allocate memory here. > I see. Thank you. > > I'm not sure, but can call trace happen where somewhere inside network > filesystem or stackable filesystem code with locks held invokes operations that > involves GFP_KENREL memory allocation outside that filesystem? > ---------- > [PATCH] SMACK: Fix incorrect GFP_KERNEL usage. > > new_inode_smack() which can be called from smack_inode_alloc_security() needs > to use GFP_NOFS like SELinux's inode_alloc_security() does, for > security_inode_alloc() is called from inode_init_always() and > inode_init_always() is called from xfs_inode_alloc() which is using GFP_NOFS. > > smack_inode_init_security() needs to use GFP_NOFS like > selinux_inode_init_security() does, for initxattrs() callback function (e.g. > btrfs_initxattrs()) which is called from security_inode_init_security() is > using GFP_NOFS. > > smack_audit_rule_match() needs to use GFP_ATOMIC, for > security_audit_rule_match() can be called from audit_filter_user_rules() and > audit_filter_user_rules() is called from audit_filter_user() with RCU read lock > held. > > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c > index cd667b4..697cf85 100644 > --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c > +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char *smack) > { > struct inode_smack *isp; > > - isp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct inode_smack), GFP_KERNEL); > + isp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct inode_smack), GFP_NOFS); > if (isp == NULL) > return NULL; > > @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int smack_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, > int may; > > if (name) { > - *name = kstrdup(XATTR_SMACK_SUFFIX, GFP_KERNEL); > + *name = kstrdup(XATTR_SMACK_SUFFIX, GFP_NOFS); > if (*name == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > } > @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int smack_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, > smk_inode_transmutable(dir)) > isp = dsp; > > - *value = kstrdup(isp, GFP_KERNEL); > + *value = kstrdup(isp, GFP_NOFS); > if (*value == NULL) > return -ENOMEM; > } > @@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule, > char *rule = vrule; > > if (!rule) { > - audit_log(actx, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR, > + audit_log(actx, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR, > "Smack: missing rule\n"); > return -ENOENT; > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html