On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 22:24 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
>
> NFSv4 can't do reliable opens in d_revalidate, since it cannot know whether a
> mount needs to be followed or not. It does check d_mountpoint() on the dentry,
> which can result in a weird error if the VFS found that the mount does not in
> fact need to be followed, e.g.:
>
> # mount --bind /mnt/nfs /mnt/nfs-clone
> # echo something > /mnt/nfs/tmp/bar
> # echo x > /tmp/file
> # mount --bind /tmp/file /mnt/nfs-clone/tmp/bar
> # cat /mnt/nfs/tmp/bar
> cat: /mnt/nfs/tmp/bar: Not a directory
>
> Which should, by any sane filesystem, result in "something" being printed.
>
> So instead do the open in f_op->open() and in the unlikely case that the cached
> dentry turned out to be invalid, drop the dentry and return ESTALE to let the
> VFS retry.
Just one comment. Would it now make sense for NFSv4 to just skip
->d_revalidate() if LOOKUP_OPEN is set, and LOOKUP_EXCL is not set? We
will in any case be doing a revalidation in nfs4_file_open.
Otherwise, the rest all looks good to me.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
