Re: [PATCH 1/1] CLONE_PARENT shouldn't allow to set ->exit_signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +       if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)
> +               p->exit_signal = -1;
> +       else if (clone_flags & CLONE_PARENT)
> +               p->exit_signal = current->group_leader->exit_signal;
> +       else
> +               p->exit_signal = (clone_flags & CSIGNAL);

So why is it "current->group_leader->exit_signal" rather than the much
more logical (imho) and simpler "current->exit_signal"?

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux