On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:10:09PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:34:46PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! I'm also just going to work on it (just noticed your mail > > > while on vacation ...). > > Brend, thanks!! > > Bruce, random question --- do you know what the copyright and > licensing terms are for the connectathon test suite? Alas. Nobody does! I'ts unlikely there's any owner who would care enough to make a fuss--so we keep using the tests, but they don't really get any love. It's one of those annoyances we argue about once a year or so, and then forget till next time. So, maybe one way forward would be to reimplement the connectathon tests for xfstests? --b. > It occurs to me > that it might be good to get some of these tests into xfstests, given > that you mentioned that the telldir test was failing even when run on > a local file system. That says to me this is a good file system level > test that we should try to get into xfstests if possible. > > Getting it into xfstests would also tend to reduce the chance of > regressions, since I always run xfstests before I submit patches (and > in fact I did run xfstests before sending you a pull request Bernd's > patches --- and I'm glad your testing caught the problem when mine > didn't!) > > Thanks, > > - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html