On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:22:30PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Replace CIFS's ->create operation with ->atomic_open and ->atomic_create. Also
> >> move the relevant code from ->lookup into the create function.
> >>
> >> CIFS currently only does atomic open for O_CREAT, but it wants to do that as
> >> early as possible, without first calling ->lookup, so it uses ->atomic_open,
> >> just like NFS.
> >
> > Why does cifs need to set the created flag from inside ->atomic_open?
> >
> > It's different from everyone else in that respect.
>
> Apparently CIFS is the only one that can tell whether the file was
> created or not. If the flag is set then notify_create() is called.
> Users of NFS doesn't seem to care, it's of dubious value anyway, but why
> not use the info when available?
It also add MAY_OPEN to acc_mode... I take it that only matters if the
fs who set created = true looks for it in ->permission()?
+ acc_mode = op->acc_mode;
+ if (created) {
+ fsnotify_create(dir, dentry);
+ acc_mode = MAY_OPEN;
+ }
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
