Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/3/2 Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>
>> I've took both on tests. The subject is acp and spd_readdir used with
>> tar, all on ext4:
>> 1) acp: http://91.234.146.107/~difrost/seekwatcher/acp_ext4.png
>> 2) spd_readdir: http://91.234.146.107/~difrost/seekwatcher/tar_ext4_readir.png
>> 3) both: http://91.234.146.107/~difrost/seekwatcher/acp_vs_spd_ext4.png
>>
>> The acp looks much better than spd_readdir but directory copy with
>> spd_readdir decreased to 52m 39sec (30 min less).
>
> Do you have stats on how big these files are, and how fragmented they
> are?  For acp and spd to give us this, I think something has gone wrong
> at writeback time (creating individual fragmented files).

How big? Which files?

-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux