On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i don't suppose we could have it say "[tid stack]" rather than "[stack]" ? or > perhaps even "[stack tid:%u]" with replacing %u with the tid ? Why do we need to differentiate a thread stack from a process stack? If someone really wants to know, the main stack is the last one since it doesn't look like mmap allocates anything above the stack right now. I like the idea of marking all stack vmas with their task ids but it will most likely break procps. Besides, I think it could be done within procps with this change rather than having the kernel do it. -- Siddhesh Poyarekar http://siddhesh.in -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
