On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:48:58AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 09-02-12 10:37:20, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > would "wait_for_thaw" vs. "thaw" be any clearer? Nitpicky I guess but the > > meaning of "thawed" isn't immediately clear here. If it's already thawed? If > > we want to wait for it it to be thawed? You can figure it out from the callers > > but maybe a comment or a different name might help. No big deal. > How about "wait_thaw". That should be explicit enough... IMO, wait_for_thaw is much easier to read (i.e. better english ;) and hence the code documents itself better. There's no reason to skimp on characters here - it's not a heavily used variable.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
