On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This doesn't affect me directly, since Lustre is itself a GPL filesystem,
> but it does seem a bit harsh for such a minor amount of functionality.
It also wasn't documented in the commit or apparently even intentional.
> Looking at inode_dio_wait(), there isn't anything in there that couldn't
> be implemented without using that GPL-only symbol export. Both inode_dio_wait()
> and __inode_dio_wait() use only functions that are themselves EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> (i.e. not GPL-only) and locally accessible structures (inode->i_dio_count
> and inode->i_state), so I don't see any benefit or reason in making
> inode_dio_wait() itself GPL.
Yes. I suspect we should just remove the _GPL part. Christoph, Al?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
