On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:30:51 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > } while (0)
> > +/*
> > + * Preemption is disabled here to make sure the
> > + * cond_func is called under the same condtions in UP
> > + * and SMP.
> > + */
> > +#define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags) \
> > + do { \
>
> How about:
>
> void *__info = (info);
>
> as to avoid double execution.
Yup. How does this look?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix
- avoid double-evaluation of `info' (per Michal)
- parenthesise evaluation of `cond_func'
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/smp.h~smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix
+++ a/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -168,10 +168,11 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(s
*/
#define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags)\
do { \
+ void *__info = (info); \
preempt_disable(); \
- if (cond_func(0, info)) { \
+ if ((cond_func)(0, __info)) { \
local_irq_disable(); \
- (func)(info); \
+ (func)(__info); \
local_irq_enable(); \
} \
preempt_enable(); \
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
