Re: [ATTEND]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Loke, Chetan <Chetan.Loke@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Exactly. So what I'm saying is, if UBI also does ftl then you could be
> duplicating code/efforts. UBI is already upstream. Now whether it
> supports everything we want is another thing.
> (and that's why I CC'd its author). So pieces that aren't there could be
> implemented. But they also talk about erase-counters etc and I don't
> know if I saw something similar in your bucket_struct[or foo_struct].
> May be its somewhere else.

I don't think code sharing is realistic for that stuff, as wear
levelling and all the other flash specific stuff needs to be done in
the same place if you want to avoid having multiple stacked indexes,
and adding wear levelling and a copying garbage collector to bcache is
going to be pretty trivial at this point.

But comparing notes/sharing algorithms could definitely be worthwhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux