On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > on_each_cpu_mask calls a function on processors specified by > cpumask, which may or may not include the local processor. > > You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or > from a hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler. > > Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> ... > --- > include/linux/smp.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/smp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > Milton made the very sensible comment that while adding on_each_cpu() in the arch generic code and removing the two arch specific instances from tile and arm in separate patches is good for review, it will break bisect. He suggested I squash them into a single commit when it goes in. Since you picked the patch set into linux-mm, will now be a good time for that? Thanks, Gilad -- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388 US Cell: +1-973-8260388 http://benyossef.com "Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider." -- Mike Galbraith, LKML -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
