On 01/26/2012 04:50 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:40:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
The Right Thing To Do here is to make the kernel behave logically and
predictably, then modify the userspace tools. But if we're modifying
the userspace tools then we would just change userspace to issue a
BLKFLSBUF to /dev/sda and leave the kernel alone.
The right fix is to make partition and whole disk access coherent,
which is fairly simply:
- create the block device inode/mapping per gendisk, and only reference
count it per block_device
- make sure blkdev_get_block(s) applies the correct offset if used on
partitions
... and what if you use 4kB blocksize and the partition start is not
aligned on 4kB? (quite common case, because partitions are often aligned
on 63 sectors) Then, you can't translate partition block numbers into disk
block numbers.
Mikulas
In your specific example, you cannot start a partition on a non-full block
address since you cannot address it. Either the device uses 512 byte sectors,
emulates 512 byte sectors or supports only 4096 byte sectors. In the first two
case, not an issue.
In the last case, still not an issue. If you send an unaligned IO down to a 4096
byte device, you get an IO error.
Also note that all (most?) user space tools have been fixed upstream (and in
distros) to align properly when the device exports its block size. The new
default alignment is 1MB from the start of disk, this should not be a concern.
Thanks!
Ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
