Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!? [was: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, January 18, 2012 02:01, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> I don't know what your ptrace jailer does.  But a task can switch
>> itself between 32-bit and 64-bit execution at will, and there's
>> nothing the kernel can do about it.  (That isn't quite true -- in
>> theory the kernel could fiddle with the GDT, but that would be
>> expensive and wouldn't work on Xen.)
>
> That's why we don't cache the CS value but check it for every system call.
> But you said elsewhere that checking CS isn't always correct either.
> I grepped arch/x86 for "user_64bit_mode", but couldn't find anything,
> but maybe my kernel sources are too old, I haven't updated this system
> for almost a year. The current code only handles 0x23 and 0x33 and kills
> the jail if it encounters anything else.

I think you're hosed on Xen, then.  Xen regularly runs with a
different Xen-specific cs value.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux