On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > + is_chrooted = (fs->root.mnt->mnt_mountpoint != > + fs->root.mnt->mnt_parent->mnt_root || > + fs->root.dentry != fs->root.mnt->mnt_root); Folks, is it _that_ hard to at least try to compile your patches? Hint: this one will *not*. That sad detail aside, this test would have been a pile of garbage even on the kernels that used to have mnt_mountpoint in struct vfsmount. What *are* you trying to test here? The last part at least does make some sense - it's "process root happens to be the root of some vfsmount". The first part, though, makes no sense whatsoever; it's "... and that vfsmount is mounted on top of root of some other vfsmount". Grr... NAKed, with extreme prejudice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
