On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:30:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Resend would be nice; I can try to dig the series out and rebase it, but... > > Here's a TOTALLY UNTESTED rebase of just that single patch from Dave. > > I did not check if the rest of the series did something that this > patch needs, so the patch may be entirely broken, but it does look > sane on its own (ie I do not see anything obviously broken in it). So > it still looks like a nice cleanup, but maybe I'm missing something > subtle, and maybe the rest of Dave's series really is required. Nothing else is required - that patch is a OK by itself as a bug fix/cleanup. > It compiles. That's all I'm going to say about my extensive testing. > Which is also why I haven't added my sign-off to it. I did quite a bit of load and stress testing on the series back when I first posted it, so the dcache changes don't have any problems I know of. > Comments? Looks OK to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
