Hello, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:57:43AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > I understand your concerns. However, the blktrace cannot get > bio->bi_flags info in its current form AFAIK. Doing it will require > extending struct blk_io_trace and it'll cause a compatibility issue, > I guess. Umm? Why can't blk_add_trace_bio_complete() look at the flags (or whatever other states) to decide to fire off BLK_TA_COMPLETE or not? What's the difference? No userland visible change is necessary at all. Just make blktrace.c do the right thing. Am I missing something? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
