Re: Bug in BLKBSZSET/GET ioctl ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:45AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> This is first reported to *libguestfs*: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624335
> 
> Then, I looked into upstream util-linux and it seems nothing wrong. I'm not convinced that it's a kernel bug.
> 
> produce:
> 
> ---
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 2048 /dev/sda6
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 512 /dev/sda6
> # ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
> 4096

I think each blockdev invocation is working on a *new* bdev object.
You'll get consistent results if somehow keep it referenced, for
example, run a background copy task:

# cp /dev/sda6 /dev/null &

# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6
# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --setbsz 512 /dev/sda6
# ./util-linux/disk-utils/blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda6

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux