Re: Intercepting system calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Rajat Thanks for your reply.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Rajat Sharma <fs.rajat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Gaurav,
>
> I would suggest to take a wrapfs source (a null stackable file-system)
> and customize it for your need. Well Erez (wrapfs author) puts his
> continuous efforts in stabilizing wrapfs and porting to new kernels
> and he is approachable too. In-fact he has acknowledged on of my patch
> and merged it into wrapfs tree.
Is there a way to mount "/" on such file system ? Like I want to
monitor / for changes like unlink or modified write. Would I be able
to see such changes using wrapfs. As by default on the systems "/"
would be mounted as  ext4 filesystem.
>
> Agreed that you can do stuffs like patching system call table but I
> (and most of us here) would categorize that as pure hack, as there
> exist no framework provided by kernel to do that. Also any approach
> you take to patch system call table won't be stable.
Yes I agree with you I want to do this using a method which is not a
hack, so that the support remains with all the versions of kernel
rather than a trick that works in a limited way.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajat
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am writing an application which would create a backup for the system
>> so that it could be restored as it is. For example I create a backup
>> using my application. I just do nothing at time of backup so it would
>> be fast. Now whenever I see any deletion I would save that file so
>> that I could restore it. Also I would like to see for
>> modification/rename. I cannot do this using inotify as I would be
>> notified after actual deletion/write. I don't want to use SELinux
>> because I want to implement this on existing installed system. I was
>> earlier thinking of replacing system calls for open/unlink with my
>> custom calls which will call my functions before actual work and then
>> I would decide what to do I would also want to reject unlink request
>> for some of the files. But as I now know that its not working in
>> linux>3.0 . I had also seen dazuko which is not supporting linux>3.0
>> yet. Also there used to be a redirfs which used to work earlier but
>> the latest kernel is not supported yet. I think a method could be to
>> replace unlink in syscall table with my unlink function but I don't
>> find any good method of doing that, as syscall table is no longer
>> exported. I would like to implement this in a kernel module instead of
>> modifying kernel code itself. Please suggest some method of doing
>> that.
>> Thanks to you all for your help.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards ,
>> Gaurav
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Thanks and Regards ,
Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux