RE: copy offload support in Linux - new system call needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> How would the server know? I suggest we deal with this by adding an
> ioctl() to allow the application to poll for progress: I'm assuming now

Why not support something like the async-iocb?


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux