Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Looks reasonable, but why doesn't all callers have that "put_mark()" thing? > > And if/when all callers *do* have that put_mark() thing, maybe we > should make destroy_mark() just do it? > > In particular, a quick grep shows that there are destroy_mark users still in: > > - fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > > - fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c (2 of them) These do in fact do "put_mark()" after the "destroy_mark()". > > - fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c This one, I think, is broken. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
