On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:14:00PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Names of the writeback reasons are used in both the main kernel as well > as for parsing the tracepoint format file. Instead of duplicating the > names in two locations making it likely that they may become out of > sync, use some macro magic to make sure all the names stay in sync. Any > update only needs to happen in one spot for it to take place in all > locations. > > Note, this is an RFC patch, and it probably needs much better comments > (well, it currently has no comments), and the C() macro probably should > have a different name too. I'm not sure this is a pattern we want to repeat all over the place - print_symbolic() is quite widely used and adding macro redefinitions all over the place doesn't fill me with joy. AFAICT this code doesn't need a declared array to work so you can just use a preprocessor construct like this (as used in XFS): #define value_1 1 #define value_2 2 ..... or enum { value_1 = 1, value_2 = 2, ..... } followed by: #define VALUES \ { value_1, "Value 1" }, \ { value_2, "Value 2" }, \ ..... And it just uses print_symbolic(__entry->value, VALUES); to print them out. If this construct does everything requiredi, then I think it is a much better pattern to use because it's easy to maintain, doesn't require an array to be declared in a C file and doesn't require macro tricks to do it's job.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html