after 250df6ed274d767da844a5d9f05720b804240197
(fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock), insert_inode_locked()
no longer returns the inode with I_NEW set on failure. However,
the error handler still calls unlock_new_inode() on failure,
which does a WARN_ON if I_NEW is not set, so any failure spews
a lot of warnings.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
index c1a3e60..7f464c5 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *parent, umode_t mode)
if (insert_inode_locked(inode) < 0) {
rc = -EINVAL;
- goto fail_unlock;
+ goto fail_put;
}
inode_init_owner(inode, parent, mode);
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ struct inode *ialloc(struct inode *parent, umode_t mode)
fail_drop:
dquot_drop(inode);
inode->i_flags |= S_NOQUOTA;
-fail_unlock:
clear_nlink(inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
fail_put:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
