(snip) > > @@ -676,6 +677,20 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space > > } > > > > /* > > + * backwards reading > > + */ > > + if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) { > > + ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS; > > + ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); > > + max = ra->start; > > + if (ra->size > max) > > + ra->size = max; > > + ra->async_size = 0; > > + ra->start -= ra->size; > IMHO much more obvious way to write this is: > ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); > if (ra->size > ra->start) { > ra->size = ra->start; > ra->start = 0; > } else > ra->start -= ra->size; Good idea! Here is the updated code: /* * backwards reading */ if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) { ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS; ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max); if (ra->size > ra->start) { /* * ra->start may be concurrently set to some huge * value, the min() at least avoids submitting huge IO * in this race condition */ ra->size = min(ra->start, max); ra->start = 0; } else ra->start -= ra->size; ra->async_size = 0; goto readit; } Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html