Re: [PATCH 5/8] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:29:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:18:24 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The accounting code will be compiled in by default (CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS=y),
> > and will remain inactive unless enabled explicitly with either boot option
> > 
> > 	readahead_stats=1
> > 
> > or through the debugfs interface
> > 
> > 	echo 1 > /debug/readahead/stats_enable
> 
> It's unfortunate that these two things have different names.

Yes unfortunately.

> I'd have thought that the debugfs knob was sufficient - no need for the
> boot option.

The boot option intents to catch the boot time readaheads.
However it's not that big deal, I'll drop the boot option.

> > The added overheads are two readahead_stats() calls per readahead.
> > Which is trivial costs unless there are concurrent random reads on
> > super fast SSDs, which may lead to cache bouncing when updating the
> > global ra_stats[][]. Considering that normal users won't need this
> > except when debugging performance problems, it's disabled by default.
> > So it looks reasonable to keep this debug code simple rather than trying
> > to improve its scalability.
> 
> I may be wrong, but I don't think the CPU cost of this code matters a
> lot.  People will rarely turn it on and disk IO is a lot slower than
> CPU actions and it's waaaaaaay more important to get high-quality info
> about readahead than it is to squeeze out a few CPU cycles.

Agreed in general.

> > @@ -51,6 +62,182 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(file_ra_state_init);
> >  
> >  #define list_to_page(head) (list_entry((head)->prev, struct page, lru))
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > +
> > +static u32 readahead_stats_enable __read_mostly;
> > +
> > +static int __init config_readahead_stats(char *str)
> > +{
> > +	int enable = 1;
> > +	get_option(&str, &enable);
> > +	readahead_stats_enable = enable;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("readahead_stats", config_readahead_stats);
> 
> Why use early_param() rather than plain old __setup()?

Heh it's a no-brain copy from other code ;)
Anyway, the readahead_stats boot parameter will be dropped.

> > +enum ra_account {
> > +	/* number of readaheads */
> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_COUNT,	/* readahead request */
> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_EOF,		/* readahead request covers EOF */
> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_CHIT,	/* readahead request covers some cached pages */
> 
> I don't like chit :)  "cache_hit" would be better.  Or just "hit".

Yeah it's not good. I renamed it to RA_ACCOUNT_CACHE_HIT.

> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_ASIZE,	/* readahead async size */

Also renamed that to RA_ACCOUNT_ASYNC_SIZE.

> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_ACTUAL,	/* readahead actual IO size */
> > +	/* end mark */
> > +	RA_ACCOUNT_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static void readahead_event(struct address_space *mapping,
> > +			    pgoff_t offset,
> > +			    unsigned long req_size,
> > +			    unsigned int ra_flags,
> > +			    pgoff_t start,
> > +			    unsigned int size,
> > +			    unsigned int async_size,
> > +			    unsigned int actual)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_READAHEAD_STATS
> > +	if (readahead_stats_enable) {
> > +		readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size, ra_flags,
> > +				start, size, async_size, actual);
> > +		readahead_stats(mapping, offset, req_size,
> > +				RA_PATTERN_ALL << READAHEAD_PATTERN_SHIFT,
> > +				start, size, async_size, actual);
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> > +}
> 
> The stub should be inlined, methinks.  The overhead of evaluating and
> preparing eight arguments is significant.  I don't think the compiler
> is yet smart enough to save us.

The parameter list actually becomes even out of control when doing the
bit fields:

+       readahead_event(mapping, offset, req_size,
+                       ra->pattern, ra->for_mmap, ra->for_metadata,
+                       ra->start + ra->size >= eof,
+                       ra->start, ra->size, ra->async_size, actual);

So I end up passing file_ra_state around. The added cost is, I'll have
to dynamically create a file_ra_state for the fadvise case, which
should be acceptable since it's a cold path.

> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- linux-next.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2011-11-21 17:08:38.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-next/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2011-11-21 17:08:51.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -2251,6 +2251,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
> >  			This default max readahead size may be overrode
> >  			in some cases, notably NFS, btrfs and software RAID.
> >  
> > +	readahead_stats[=0|1]
> > +			Enable/disable readahead stats accounting.
> > +
> > +			It's also possible to enable/disable it after boot:
> > +			echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable
> 
> Can the current setting be read back?

Yes. This is possible:

        echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/readahead/stats_enable

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux