On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:36:14AM +0800, Chris Mason wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:24:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty > > limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the > > next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm. > > Thanks Wu, were you planning on pushing this through your tree or should > I take it? Will you take it please? Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
