On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:25:33 +0100, David Sterba <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw this while running the newly added tests on btrfs:
>
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:55:50PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/269
> > +_workout()
> > +{
> > + echo ""
> > + echo "Run fsstress"
> > + echo ""
> > + num_iterations=10
> > + enospc_time=2
> > + out=$SCRATCH_MNT/fsstress.$$
> > + args="-p128 -n999999999 -f setattr=1 $FSSTRESS_AVOID -d $out"
> > + echo "fsstress $args" >> $here/$seq.full
> > + $FSSTRESS_PROG $args > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> > + pid=$!
> > + echo "Run dd writers in parallel"
> > + for ((i=0; i < num_iterations; i++))
> > + do
> > + # File will be opened with O_TRUNC each time
> > + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/SPACE_CONSUMER bs=1M count=1 \
> > + > /dev/null 2>&1
> > + sleep $enospc_time
> > + done
> > + kill $pid
>
> 269 [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see 269.out.bad)
> --- 269.out 2011-11-07 13:26:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ 269.out.bad 2011-11-07 14:07:44.000000000 +0100
> @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
> Run fsstress
>
> Run dd writers in parallel
> +./269: line 60: kill: (9754) - No such process
>
> > + wait $pid
> > +}
>
> and the test is reported to fail. Seems that the dd commands finish in less 2
> seconds.
Have you recompile fsstress via make?
test explicitly want use new feature "-f setattr=1"
>
>
> david
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
