Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:54:16 -0400, Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > Alex, Eric, Dave - should we add new tests with the new operations
> > Dmitry added, or is adding new ops to the existing tests fine?
> 
> One argument for adding new ops to existing tests is that it makes the run time of the entire test suite take longer.   A QA pass is already taking quite a while, and it would be nice if we could keep xfstests as efficient as possible in terms of the maximum testing coverage per time spent running the test suite….
Yes, but regression test with explicit seed option should be
preserved. Number of such test is not too big, so it is reasonable to
hardcode set of operations in such tests and let all others use new features.
> 
> -- Ted
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux