Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:36:36AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Strange... this means that parent process died unexpectedly.
> Works fine fore me. In my case this happen once due to unknown
> options(new opt " -fsetattr=1" passed to fsstress explicitly) because i've
> forget to rebuilt fsstress via make. Can you please explicitly rebuild,
> and check one more time to be 100% sure.

Oh, looks like it wanted the setattr option.  I held back all the new
features for now until we figure if we want them for existing tests.

I've applied and pushed out the first three patches for now, the others
should follow as soon as I've decided on what to do with new operations.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux