Re: [PATCH 12/13] vfs: count unlinked inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:20:06AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Okay, so a WARN_ON is not warranted.  Perhaps a printk instead?
> 
> While initializing nlink with zero normally shouldn't be a problem it
> might indicate something unexpected.

Please do a ratelimited printk.  If the log recovery case hits any fs
it will usually do it for tons of inodes in a short period.

Also please try to stick to 80 character lines if possible.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux