Re: [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 15:10 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> How about the below change. This will require richacl tools change
> also.

>  I made the e_flags 32 bit to make sure we don't take the space
>  needed NFSv4 ACL related flags.

But struct richace_xattr has a hole now.  

There's ample of space left in the 16-bit field; I don't think there is
a need to extend it.  If the need should ever arise, we can still define
a new version of the xattr format.  Also, this change creates a hole in
struct richace_xattr; we can't do that.

> +#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO		0x80000000
> +#define ACE4_UNIXID_WHO			0x40000000

Can the ACE4_UNIXID_WHO flag please be removed again?  It isn't needed,
it just creates a mess.

Thanks,
Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux