Re: [PATCH] nfs-utils: mount: really return from errno test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/11/2011 05:44 AM, Hamo wrote:
> We should only try next address family if we meet ECONNREFUSED or EHOSTUNREACH
> for v4 or ECONNREFUSED or EOPNOTSUPP or EHOSTUNREACH for v3v2.
> Before, only a break in swich can not make the program out of for loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Bai <hamo.by@xxxxxxxxx>
Committed....

steved.

> ---
>  utils/mount/stropts.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> index 314a806..4032bf3 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
> +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> @@ -665,9 +665,10 @@ static int nfs_try_mount_v3v2(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
>  		case EHOSTUNREACH:
>  			continue;
>  		default:
> -			break;
> +			goto out;
>  		}
>  	}
> +out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> @@ -751,9 +752,10 @@ static int nfs_try_mount_v4(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
>  		case EHOSTUNREACH:
>  			continue;
>  		default:
> -			break;
> +			goto out;
>  		}
>  	}
> +out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux