On 10/10/2011 12:47 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
One quick question:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 00:11:05 -0700
Allison Henderson<achender@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ /* Secure delete any blocks still in our range */
+ if (jbd2_pblk_count> 0)
+ err = ext4_secure_delete_pblks(journal->j_inode,
+ jbd2_pblk_start, jbd2_pblk_count);
+
+out:
+ spin_unlock(&journal->j_pair_lock);
ext4_secure_delete_pblks() appears to do its job synchronously - it has
calls to things like sync_dirty_buffer() and such. How can you do that
while holding ->j_pair_lock?
Thanks,
jon
Hi Jon,
Well j_pair_lock is a lock I added to protect the new list of vfs
-> jbd2 block pairs. It is locked by the journal commit thread to
update the list when ever a journal block is modified. The above
code here is called by the same thread that performs a punch hole or
truncate operation, not the journal commit thread. So I'm not
immediately seeing why there would be any lock problems. Is there
another case I'm missing?
Allison
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
