On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:11:41PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > The code in the patch doesn't explain to me why you'd need to call > dentry_lru_prune() rather than dentry_lru_del()? It's something to > do with the difference between active and inactive LRU removal, but Whenever we actually remove a object it needs to be removed, if it only gets deleted from the LRU because it now has a reference and doesn't belong onto the LRU it doesn't. But yes, this really should be documented better in the code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
